The concept of speciesism implies that one animal or group is being judged according to criteria which do not apply equally to all animals. Foremost among these criteria are the capacity to feel pleasure and pain as well as the ability to experience fear. By giving preferential treatment and rights to certain sentient beings over others based on arbitrary factors such as species membership, we are essentially setting up a hierarchy within nature where some life forms have more value than others (Knight 2012). This disregards the fact that each life form has its own unique characteristics and intrinsic worth regardless of whether they belong to a particular species.
Peter Singer argues that eating meat is speciesism because it involves sacrificing the most important interests of members of other species for relatively trivial interests of our own species. Do you think Singer is correct or incorrect on this point?
However while agree general idea behind Singer’s opinion there still whole host issues need taken account order properly evaluate situation For instance should ask ourselves if eliminating meat entirely best way address problem We must consider whether alternative solutions exist such large scale vegetarianism local small scale farming free range livestock Finally should discuss ways society can help transition process mitigate effects change lifestyle diets currently experienced by vast majority population would entail.<<b<works=\”\” cited:<b<=”\”\”” b=”\”\””></b<works=\”\”>